← Back to Model Hub/SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW
SHARE THIS:

Claude Opus 4.6 vs Llama 3.1 8B

How do these models stack up? Below is an expert side-by-side comparison of specifications, context window capacity, live pricing per million tokens, and standardized benchmark scores for Claude Opus 4.6 and Llama 3.1 8B.

Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.6

Opus 4.6 is Anthropic’s strongest model for coding and long-running professional tasks. It is built for agents that operate across entire workflows rather than single prompts, making it especially effective...

View Full Specs
Meta

Llama 3.1 8B

Llama 3.1 8B is Meta's lightweight open-weight model from the Llama 3.1 generation, optimized for efficient deployment on consumer hardware and edge devices. Despite its compact 8-billion-parameter size, it delivers strong performance on instruction following, text summarization, and lightweight coding tasks. Lllama 3.1 8B is the most downloaded model in the Llama family and runs efficiently on laptops, single GPUs, and CPU via quantization — making it the default choice for on-device AI applications and local prototyping.

View Full Specs

Technical Specifications

SpecificationClaude Opus 4.6Llama 3.1 8B
ProviderAnthropicMeta
Context Window1,000,000 tokens131,072 tokens
Agent Suitability95/10074/100
Time to First Token (TTFT)500 ms80 ms
Deployment Modelmanaged apiself hostable
Production Stabilitystablestable
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2026-02-042024-07-23

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

Claude Opus 4.6

$5.00

Llama 3.1 8B

$0.04

Output Price per Million Tokens

Claude Opus 4.6

$25.00

Llama 3.1 8B

$0.04

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt prompts in our dynamic Sandbox. Check execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Scores show the raw performance percentages verified across key evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior accuracy and capability in that domain.

MMLUGeneral knowledge & multi-task understanding
9250.0%vsN/A
Claude Opus 4.6
Llama 3.1 8B
HumanEvalPython coding & logic synthesis
9450.0%vsN/A
Claude Opus 4.6
Llama 3.1 8B
MATHComplex mathematical problem solving
8890.0%vsN/A
Claude Opus 4.6
Llama 3.1 8B
GPQAGraduate-level expert reasoning
7980.0%vsN/A
Claude Opus 4.6
Llama 3.1 8B
HellaSwagCommonsense reasoning and inference
9750.0%vsN/A
Claude Opus 4.6
Llama 3.1 8B
MT-BenchMulti-turn conversation flow quality
965.0%vsN/A
Claude Opus 4.6
Llama 3.1 8B

Claude Opus 4.6 Quirks & Gotchas

  • Best for long-context document analysis and legal review
  • Tool calling requires structured prompt — prone to verbose refusal without explicit output schema

Llama 3.1 8B Quirks & Gotchas

  • Perfect for CPU/edge deployment — runs on Raspberry Pi with quantization
  • Limited tool calling vs larger models — best for simple classification and chat