← Back to Model Hub/SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW
SHARE THIS:

Claude Opus 4.6 vs Llama 3.1 405B

How do these models stack up? Below is an expert side-by-side comparison of specifications, context window capacity, live pricing per million tokens, and standardized benchmark scores for Claude Opus 4.6 and Llama 3.1 405B.

Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.6

Opus 4.6 is Anthropic’s strongest model for coding and long-running professional tasks. It is built for agents that operate across entire workflows rather than single prompts, making it especially effective...

View Full Specs
Meta

Llama 3.1 405B

Llama 3.1 405B is Meta's largest open-weight language model and one of the most capable openly available models in the world. With 405 billion parameters, it achieves performance competitive with GPT-4 and Claude Opus across benchmarks spanning general knowledge, mathematics, coding, and multilingual tasks. Llama 3.1 405B is released under Meta's custom commercial license, supporting broad use cases including deployment via major cloud providers (AWS, GCP, Azure) and self-hosted inference with multi-GPU configurations.

View Full Specs

Technical Specifications

SpecificationClaude Opus 4.6Llama 3.1 405B
ProviderAnthropicMeta
Context Window1,000,000 tokens131,072 tokens
Agent Suitability95/10090/100
Time to First Token (TTFT)500 ms550 ms
Deployment Modelmanaged apiself hostable
Production Stabilitystablestable
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2026-02-042024-07-23

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

Claude Opus 4.6

$5.00

Llama 3.1 405B

$0.80

Output Price per Million Tokens

Claude Opus 4.6

$25.00

Llama 3.1 405B

$0.80

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt prompts in our dynamic Sandbox. Check execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Scores show the raw performance percentages verified across key evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior accuracy and capability in that domain.

MMLUGeneral knowledge & multi-task understanding
9250.0%vsN/A
Claude Opus 4.6
Llama 3.1 405B
HumanEvalPython coding & logic synthesis
9450.0%vsN/A
Claude Opus 4.6
Llama 3.1 405B
MATHComplex mathematical problem solving
8890.0%vsN/A
Claude Opus 4.6
Llama 3.1 405B
GPQAGraduate-level expert reasoning
7980.0%vsN/A
Claude Opus 4.6
Llama 3.1 405B
HellaSwagCommonsense reasoning and inference
9750.0%vsN/A
Claude Opus 4.6
Llama 3.1 405B
MT-BenchMulti-turn conversation flow quality
965.0%vsN/A
Claude Opus 4.6
Llama 3.1 405B

Claude Opus 4.6 Quirks & Gotchas

  • Best for long-context document analysis and legal review
  • Tool calling requires structured prompt — prone to verbose refusal without explicit output schema

Llama 3.1 405B Quirks & Gotchas

  • Massive model — requires 8× A100 80GB for FP16 inference
  • Available via Together AI, Fireworks, and Bedrock as managed API