Claude Opus 4.6 vs Grok 4.3
How do these models stack up? Below is an expert side-by-side comparison of specifications, context window capacity, live pricing per million tokens, and standardized benchmark scores for Claude Opus 4.6 and Grok 4.3.
Claude Opus 4.6
Opus 4.6 is Anthropic’s strongest model for coding and long-running professional tasks. It is built for agents that operate across entire workflows rather than single prompts, making it especially effective...
Grok 4.3
Grok 4.3 is a reasoning model from xAI. It accepts text and image inputs with text output, and is suited for agentic workflows, instruction-following tasks, and applications requiring high factual...
Technical Specifications
| Specification | Claude Opus 4.6 | Grok 4.3 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | xAI |
| Context Window | 1,000,000 tokens | 1,000,000 tokens |
| Agent Suitability | 95/100 | 87/100 |
| Time to First Token (TTFT) | 500 ms | 400 ms |
| Deployment Model | managed api | managed api |
| Production Stability | stable | stable |
| API Available | Yes | Yes |
| Released Date | 2026-02-04 | 2026-04-30 |
API Pricing Comparison
Input Price per Million Tokens
Claude Opus 4.6
$5.00
Grok 4.3
$1.25
Output Price per Million Tokens
Claude Opus 4.6
$25.00
Grok 4.3
$2.50
Want to test both models live?
Run side-by-side prompt prompts in our dynamic Sandbox. Check execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.
Benchmark Performance Metrics
Scores show the raw performance percentages verified across key evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior accuracy and capability in that domain.
Claude Opus 4.6 Quirks & Gotchas
- ▸Best for long-context document analysis and legal review
- ▸Tool calling requires structured prompt — prone to verbose refusal without explicit output schema
Grok 4.3 Quirks & Gotchas
- ▸Strong coding performance — competitive with Claude Sonnet at similar price point
- ▸Upgrade to Grok 4.20 for improved reasoning and tool calling