← Back to Model Hub/SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW
SHARE THIS:

Claude Opus 4.6 vs GPT-5.5 Pro

How do these models stack up? Below is an expert side-by-side comparison of specifications, context window capacity, live pricing per million tokens, and standardized benchmark scores for Claude Opus 4.6 and GPT-5.5 Pro.

Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.6

Opus 4.6 is Anthropic’s strongest model for coding and long-running professional tasks. It is built for agents that operate across entire workflows rather than single prompts, making it especially effective...

View Full Specs
OpenAI

GPT-5.5 Pro

GPT-5.5 Pro is OpenAI’s high-capability model optimized for deep reasoning and accuracy on complex, high-stakes workloads. It features a 1M+ token context window (922K input, 128K output) with support for...

View Full Specs

Technical Specifications

SpecificationClaude Opus 4.6GPT-5.5 Pro
ProviderAnthropicOpenAI
Context Window1,000,000 tokens1,050,000 tokens
Agent Suitability95/10098/100
Time to First Token (TTFT)500 ms450 ms
Deployment Modelmanaged apimanaged api
Production Stabilitystablebeta
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2026-02-042026-04-24

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

Claude Opus 4.6

$5.00

GPT-5.5 Pro

$30.00

Output Price per Million Tokens

Claude Opus 4.6

$25.00

GPT-5.5 Pro

$180.00

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt prompts in our dynamic Sandbox. Check execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Scores show the raw performance percentages verified across key evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior accuracy and capability in that domain.

MMLUGeneral knowledge & multi-task understanding
9250.0%vs9650.0%
Claude Opus 4.6
GPT-5.5 Pro
HumanEvalPython coding & logic synthesis
9450.0%vs9820.0%
Claude Opus 4.6
GPT-5.5 Pro
MATHComplex mathematical problem solving
8890.0%vs9600.0%
Claude Opus 4.6
GPT-5.5 Pro
GPQAGraduate-level expert reasoning
7980.0%vs8910.0%
Claude Opus 4.6
GPT-5.5 Pro
HellaSwagCommonsense reasoning and inference
9750.0%vs9940.0%
Claude Opus 4.6
GPT-5.5 Pro
MT-BenchMulti-turn conversation flow quality
965.0%vs990.0%
Claude Opus 4.6
GPT-5.5 Pro

Claude Opus 4.6 Quirks & Gotchas

  • Best for long-context document analysis and legal review
  • Tool calling requires structured prompt — prone to verbose refusal without explicit output schema

GPT-5.5 Pro Quirks & Gotchas

  • Best-in-class instruction following for complex agentic chains
  • Premium pricing — use GPT-5 for cost-sensitive workloads