Claude Opus 4.5 vs Gemma 3n 4B
How do these models stack up? Below is an expert side-by-side comparison of specifications, context window capacity, live pricing per million tokens, and standardized benchmark scores for Claude Opus 4.5 and Gemma 3n 4B.
Claude Opus 4.5
Claude Opus 4.5 is Anthropic’s frontier reasoning model optimized for complex software engineering, agentic workflows, and long-horizon computer use. It offers strong multimodal capabilities, competitive performance across real-world coding and...
Gemma 3n 4B
Gemma 3n E4B-it is optimized for efficient execution on mobile and low-resource devices, such as phones, laptops, and tablets. It supports multimodal inputs—including text, visual data, and audio—enabling diverse tasks...
Technical Specifications
| Specification | Claude Opus 4.5 | Gemma 3n 4B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | |
| Context Window | 200,000 tokens | 32,768 tokens |
| Agent Suitability | 93/100 | N/A |
| Time to First Token (TTFT) | 550 ms | N/A |
| Deployment Model | managed api | managed api |
| Production Stability | stable | stable |
| API Available | Yes | Yes |
| Released Date | 2025-11-24 | 2025-05-20 |
API Pricing Comparison
Input Price per Million Tokens
Claude Opus 4.5
$5.00
Gemma 3n 4B
$0.06
Output Price per Million Tokens
Claude Opus 4.5
$25.00
Gemma 3n 4B
$0.12
Want to test both models live?
Run side-by-side prompt prompts in our dynamic Sandbox. Check execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.
Benchmark Performance Metrics
Scores show the raw performance percentages verified across key evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior accuracy and capability in that domain.
Claude Opus 4.5 Quirks & Gotchas
- ▸Deep analytical reasoning — best for structured problem-solving
- ▸200K context is limiting compared to 1M of Opus 4.6+ — upgrade for long-document tasks
Gemma 3n 4B Quirks & Gotchas
No developer gotchas reported.