← Back to Model Hub/SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW
SHARE THIS:

Claude Opus 4.1 vs Qwen3.6 Flash

How do these models stack up? Below is an expert side-by-side comparison of specifications, context window capacity, live pricing per million tokens, and standardized benchmark scores for Claude Opus 4.1 and Qwen3.6 Flash.

Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.1

Claude Opus 4.1 is an updated version of Anthropic’s flagship model, offering improved performance in coding, reasoning, and agentic tasks. It achieves 74.5% on SWE-bench Verified and shows notable gains...

View Full Specs
Alibaba

Qwen3.6 Flash

Qwen3.6 Flash is a fast, efficient language model from Alibaba's Qwen 3.6 series. It supports text, image, and video input with a 1M token context window. Tiered pricing kicks in...

View Full Specs

Technical Specifications

SpecificationClaude Opus 4.1Qwen3.6 Flash
ProviderAnthropicAlibaba
Context Window200,000 tokens1,000,000 tokens
Agent SuitabilityN/AN/A
Time to First Token (TTFT)N/AN/A
Deployment Modelmanaged apiself hostable
Production Stabilitystablebeta
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2025-08-052026-04-27

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

Claude Opus 4.1

$15.00

Qwen3.6 Flash

$0.19

Output Price per Million Tokens

Claude Opus 4.1

$75.00

Qwen3.6 Flash

$1.13

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt prompts in our dynamic Sandbox. Check execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Scores show the raw performance percentages verified across key evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior accuracy and capability in that domain.

Claude Opus 4.1 Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Qwen3.6 Flash Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.