← Back to Model Hub/SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW
SHARE THIS:

Claude Opus 4.1 vs Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)

How do these models stack up? Below is an expert side-by-side comparison of specifications, context window capacity, live pricing per million tokens, and standardized benchmark scores for Claude Opus 4.1 and Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image).

Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.1

Claude Opus 4.1 is an updated version of Anthropic’s flagship model, offering improved performance in coding, reasoning, and agentic tasks. It achieves 74.5% on SWE-bench Verified and shows notable gains...

View Full Specs
Google

Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)

Gemini 2.5 Flash Image, a.k.a. "Nano Banana," is now generally available. It is a state of the art image generation model with contextual understanding. It is capable of image generation,...

View Full Specs

Technical Specifications

SpecificationClaude Opus 4.1Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)
ProviderAnthropicGoogle
Context Window200,000 tokens32,768 tokens
Agent SuitabilityN/AN/A
Time to First Token (TTFT)N/AN/A
Deployment Modelmanaged apimanaged api
Production Stabilitystablestable
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2025-08-052025-10-07

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

Claude Opus 4.1

$15.00

Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)

$0.30

Output Price per Million Tokens

Claude Opus 4.1

$75.00

Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image)

$2.50

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt prompts in our dynamic Sandbox. Check execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Scores show the raw performance percentages verified across key evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior accuracy and capability in that domain.

Claude Opus 4.1 Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Nano Banana (Gemini 2.5 Flash Image) Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.