← Back to Model Hub/SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW
SHARE THIS:

Claude Opus 4.1 vs Gemma 4 26B A4B

How do these models stack up? Below is an expert side-by-side comparison of specifications, context window capacity, live pricing per million tokens, and standardized benchmark scores for Claude Opus 4.1 and Gemma 4 26B A4B.

Anthropic

Claude Opus 4.1

Claude Opus 4.1 is an updated version of Anthropic’s flagship model, offering improved performance in coding, reasoning, and agentic tasks. It achieves 74.5% on SWE-bench Verified and shows notable gains...

View Full Specs
Google

Gemma 4 26B A4B

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is an instruction-tuned Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) model from Google DeepMind. Despite 25.2B total parameters, only 3.8B activate per token during inference — delivering near-31B quality at...

View Full Specs

Technical Specifications

SpecificationClaude Opus 4.1Gemma 4 26B A4B
ProviderAnthropicGoogle
Context Window200,000 tokens262,144 tokens
Agent SuitabilityN/AN/A
Time to First Token (TTFT)N/AN/A
Deployment Modelmanaged apimanaged api
Production Stabilitystablestable
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2025-08-052026-04-03

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

Claude Opus 4.1

$15.00

Gemma 4 26B A4B

$0.06

Output Price per Million Tokens

Claude Opus 4.1

$75.00

Gemma 4 26B A4B

$0.33

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt prompts in our dynamic Sandbox. Check execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Scores show the raw performance percentages verified across key evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior accuracy and capability in that domain.

Claude Opus 4.1 Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Gemma 4 26B A4B Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.