Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
How do these models stack up? Below is an expert side-by-side comparison of specifications, context window capacity, live pricing per million tokens, and standardized benchmark scores for Claude Haiku 4.5 and Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking.
Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Haiku 4.5 is Anthropic’s fastest and most efficient model, delivering near-frontier intelligence at a fraction of the cost and latency of larger Claude models. Matching Claude Sonnet 4’s performance...
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
Qwen3-Next-80B-A3B-Thinking is a reasoning-first chat model in the Qwen3-Next line that outputs structured “thinking” traces by default. It’s designed for hard multi-step problems; math proofs, code synthesis/debugging, logic, and agentic...
Technical Specifications
| Specification | Claude Haiku 4.5 | Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Alibaba |
| Context Window | 200,000 tokens | 262,144 tokens |
| Agent Suitability | 87/100 | N/A |
| Time to First Token (TTFT) | 180 ms | N/A |
| Deployment Model | managed api | self hostable |
| Production Stability | stable | stable |
| API Available | Yes | Yes |
| Released Date | 2025-10-15 | 2025-09-11 |
API Pricing Comparison
Input Price per Million Tokens
Claude Haiku 4.5
$1.00
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
$0.10
Output Price per Million Tokens
Claude Haiku 4.5
$5.00
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
$0.78
Want to test both models live?
Run side-by-side prompt prompts in our dynamic Sandbox. Check execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.
Benchmark Performance Metrics
Scores show the raw performance percentages verified across key evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior accuracy and capability in that domain.
Claude Haiku 4.5 Quirks & Gotchas
- ▸Fastest TTFT in the Claude lineup — ideal for real-time chat
- ▸Tool calling limited compared to Sonnet — best for simple classification and routing
Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking Quirks & Gotchas
No developer gotchas reported.