Claude Haiku 4.5 vs GLM 4.7 Flash
How do these models stack up? Below is an expert side-by-side comparison of specifications, context window capacity, live pricing per million tokens, and standardized benchmark scores for Claude Haiku 4.5 and GLM 4.7 Flash.
Claude Haiku 4.5
Claude Haiku 4.5 is Anthropic’s fastest and most efficient model, delivering near-frontier intelligence at a fraction of the cost and latency of larger Claude models. Matching Claude Sonnet 4’s performance...
GLM 4.7 Flash
As a 30B-class SOTA model, GLM-4.7-Flash offers a new option that balances performance and efficiency. It is further optimized for agentic coding use cases, strengthening coding capabilities, long-horizon task planning,...
Technical Specifications
| Specification | Claude Haiku 4.5 | GLM 4.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | Zhipu AI |
| Context Window | 200,000 tokens | 202,752 tokens |
| Agent Suitability | 87/100 | N/A |
| Time to First Token (TTFT) | 180 ms | N/A |
| Deployment Model | managed api | managed api |
| Production Stability | stable | stable |
| API Available | Yes | Yes |
| Released Date | 2025-10-15 | 2026-01-19 |
API Pricing Comparison
Input Price per Million Tokens
Claude Haiku 4.5
$1.00
GLM 4.7 Flash
$0.06
Output Price per Million Tokens
Claude Haiku 4.5
$5.00
GLM 4.7 Flash
$0.40
Want to test both models live?
Run side-by-side prompt prompts in our dynamic Sandbox. Check execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.
Benchmark Performance Metrics
Scores show the raw performance percentages verified across key evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior accuracy and capability in that domain.
Claude Haiku 4.5 Quirks & Gotchas
- ▸Fastest TTFT in the Claude lineup — ideal for real-time chat
- ▸Tool calling limited compared to Sonnet — best for simple classification and routing
GLM 4.7 Flash Quirks & Gotchas
No developer gotchas reported.