โ† Back to Model Hub/SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW
SHARE THIS:

Claude 3 Opus vs o1

How do these models stack up? Below is an expert side-by-side comparison of specifications, context window capacity, live pricing per million tokens, and standardized benchmark scores for Claude 3 Opus and o1.

Anthropic

Claude 3 Opus

Claude 3 Opus is Anthropic's most powerful model from the first Claude 3 generation, engineered for deep analysis, comprehensive research, and demanding multi-step task execution. Released in March 2024, it represented the frontier of Anthropic's capabilities at the time, with a 200,000-token context window suitable for processing large documents, synthesizing diverse research sources, and generating expert-level written content. Priced at $15/MTok for input, Claude 3 Opus remains available for teams with specific requirements for Claude 3-generation behavior, though most use cases are better served by the improved Claude 4 series.

View Full Specs
OpenAI

o1

The latest and strongest model family from OpenAI, o1 is designed to spend more time thinking before responding. The o1 model series is trained with large-scale reinforcement learning to reason...

View Full Specs

Technical Specifications

SpecificationClaude 3 Opuso1
ProviderAnthropicOpenAI
Context Window200,000 tokens200,000 tokens
Agent SuitabilityN/A88/100
Time to First Token (TTFT)N/A2500 ms
Deployment ModelN/Amanaged api
Production Stabilitystablestable
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2024-03-042024-12-17

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

Claude 3 Opus

$15.00

o1

$15.00

Output Price per Million Tokens

Claude 3 Opus

$75.00

o1

$60.00

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt prompts in our dynamic Sandbox. Check execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Scores show the raw performance percentages verified across key evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior accuracy and capability in that domain.

MMLUGeneral knowledge & multi-task understanding
8680.0%vs9180.0%
Claude 3 Opus
o1
HumanEvalPython coding & logic synthesis
8490.0%vs9450.0%
Claude 3 Opus
o1
MATHComplex mathematical problem solving
6010.0%vs9480.0%
Claude 3 Opus
o1
GPQAGraduate-level expert reasoning
5040.0%vs7830.0%
Claude 3 Opus
o1
HellaSwagCommonsense reasoning and inference
9500.0%vs9200.0%
Claude 3 Opus
o1
MT-BenchMulti-turn conversation flow quality
900.0%vs940.0%
Claude 3 Opus
o1

Claude 3 Opus Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

o1 Quirks & Gotchas

  • โ–ธReasoning model โ€” high latency by design, not for real-time use
  • โ–ธBest for complex math/code reasoning where accuracy > speed
  • โ–ธUse o3-mini when you need reasoning with lower latency