Claude 3 Haiku vs Gemma 4 31B
How do these models stack up? Below is an expert side-by-side comparison of specifications, context window capacity, live pricing per million tokens, and standardized benchmark scores for Claude 3 Haiku and Gemma 4 31B.
Claude 3 Haiku
Claude 3 Haiku is Anthropic's fastest and most compact model for near-instant responsiveness. Quick and accurate targeted performance. See the launch announcement and benchmark results [here](https://www.anthropic.com/news/claude-3-haiku) #multimodal
Gemma 4 31B
Gemma 4 31B Instruct is Google DeepMind's 30.7B dense multimodal model supporting text and image input with text output. Features a 256K token context window, configurable thinking/reasoning mode, native function...
Technical Specifications
| Specification | Claude 3 Haiku | Gemma 4 31B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Anthropic | |
| Context Window | 200,000 tokens | 262,144 tokens |
| Agent Suitability | N/A | N/A |
| Time to First Token (TTFT) | N/A | N/A |
| Deployment Model | managed api | managed api |
| Production Stability | stable | stable |
| API Available | Yes | Yes |
| Released Date | 2024-03-13 | 2026-04-02 |
API Pricing Comparison
Input Price per Million Tokens
Claude 3 Haiku
$0.25
Gemma 4 31B
$0.12
Output Price per Million Tokens
Claude 3 Haiku
$1.25
Gemma 4 31B
$0.35
Want to test both models live?
Run side-by-side prompt prompts in our dynamic Sandbox. Check execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.
Benchmark Performance Metrics
Scores show the raw performance percentages verified across key evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior accuracy and capability in that domain.
Claude 3 Haiku Quirks & Gotchas
No developer gotchas reported.
Gemma 4 31B Quirks & Gotchas
No developer gotchas reported.