โ† Back to Model Hub/SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW
SHARE THIS:

Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs o1

How do these models stack up? Below is an expert side-by-side comparison of specifications, context window capacity, live pricing per million tokens, and standardized benchmark scores for Claude 3.5 Sonnet and o1.

Anthropic

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Claude 3.5 Sonnet was Anthropic's breakout model of 2024, widely regarded as one of the most capable commercial LLMs of its generation. It earned widespread developer praise for its exceptional coding ability, nuanced long-form writing, and reliable complex reasoning across a 200,000-token context window. Claude 3.5 Sonnet introduced computer-use capabilities, enabling it to interact with desktop environments, web browsers, and software tools autonomously. Available via API at $3/MTok for input, it continues to be a popular choice for developers who want a well-rounded, safety-aligned model with strong benchmark performance for coding, analysis, and content generation tasks.

View Full Specs
OpenAI

o1

The latest and strongest model family from OpenAI, o1 is designed to spend more time thinking before responding. The o1 model series is trained with large-scale reinforcement learning to reason...

View Full Specs

Technical Specifications

SpecificationClaude 3.5 Sonneto1
ProviderAnthropicOpenAI
Context Window200,000 tokens200,000 tokens
Agent SuitabilityN/A88/100
Time to First Token (TTFT)N/A2500 ms
Deployment ModelN/Amanaged api
Production Stabilitystablestable
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2024-06-212024-12-17

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

$3.00

o1

$15.00

Output Price per Million Tokens

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

$15.00

o1

$60.00

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt prompts in our dynamic Sandbox. Check execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Scores show the raw performance percentages verified across key evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior accuracy and capability in that domain.

MMLUGeneral knowledge & multi-task understanding
8870.0%vs9180.0%
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
o1
HumanEvalPython coding & logic synthesis
9200.0%vs9450.0%
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
o1
MATHComplex mathematical problem solving
7110.0%vs9480.0%
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
o1
GPQAGraduate-level expert reasoning
5940.0%vs7830.0%
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
o1
HellaSwagCommonsense reasoning and inference
9540.0%vs9200.0%
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
o1
MT-BenchMulti-turn conversation flow quality
935.0%vs940.0%
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
o1

Claude 3.5 Sonnet Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

o1 Quirks & Gotchas

  • โ–ธReasoning model โ€” high latency by design, not for real-time use
  • โ–ธBest for complex math/code reasoning where accuracy > speed
  • โ–ธUse o3-mini when you need reasoning with lower latency