โ† Back to Model Hub/SIDE-BY-SIDE REVIEW
SHARE THIS:

Claude 3.5 Sonnet vs Kimi K2.6

How do these models stack up? Below is an expert side-by-side comparison of specifications, context window capacity, live pricing per million tokens, and standardized benchmark scores for Claude 3.5 Sonnet and Kimi K2.6.

Anthropic

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

Claude 3.5 Sonnet was Anthropic's breakout model of 2024, widely regarded as one of the most capable commercial LLMs of its generation. It earned widespread developer praise for its exceptional coding ability, nuanced long-form writing, and reliable complex reasoning across a 200,000-token context window. Claude 3.5 Sonnet introduced computer-use capabilities, enabling it to interact with desktop environments, web browsers, and software tools autonomously. Available via API at $3/MTok for input, it continues to be a popular choice for developers who want a well-rounded, safety-aligned model with strong benchmark performance for coding, analysis, and content generation tasks.

View Full Specs
Moonshot AI

Kimi K2.6

Kimi K2.6 is Moonshot AI's next-generation multimodal model, designed for long-horizon coding, coding-driven UI/UX generation, and multi-agent orchestration. It handles complex end-to-end coding tasks across Python, Rust, and Go, and...

View Full Specs

Technical Specifications

SpecificationClaude 3.5 SonnetKimi K2.6
ProviderAnthropicMoonshot AI
Context Window200,000 tokens262,144 tokens
Agent SuitabilityN/AN/A
Time to First Token (TTFT)N/AN/A
Deployment ModelN/Amanaged api
Production Stabilitystablestable
API AvailableYesYes
Released Date2024-06-212026-04-20

API Pricing Comparison

Input Price per Million Tokens

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

$3.00

Kimi K2.6

$0.66

Output Price per Million Tokens

Claude 3.5 Sonnet

$15.00

Kimi K2.6

$3.41

Want to test both models live?

Run side-by-side prompt prompts in our dynamic Sandbox. Check execution speeds, latency metrics, and compute actual costs in real-time.

Benchmark Performance Metrics

Scores show the raw performance percentages verified across key evaluation suites. Higher bars indicate superior accuracy and capability in that domain.

MMLUGeneral knowledge & multi-task understanding
8870.0%vs8420.0%
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Kimi K2.6
HumanEvalPython coding & logic synthesis
9200.0%vs8500.0%
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Kimi K2.6
MATHComplex mathematical problem solving
7110.0%vs6400.0%
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Kimi K2.6
GPQAGraduate-level expert reasoning
5940.0%vs4300.0%
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Kimi K2.6
HellaSwagCommonsense reasoning and inference
9540.0%vs8500.0%
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Kimi K2.6
MT-BenchMulti-turn conversation flow quality
935.0%vs890.0%
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Kimi K2.6

Claude 3.5 Sonnet Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.

Kimi K2.6 Quirks & Gotchas

No developer gotchas reported.